Everything Photoshop Subscribe
Preview

Design a Glossy Download Icon

In Designing by Arik

The difficulty in designing web graphics is not so much in the actual execution of the design, but more in the planning of it. At the same time you want the graphic to be eye-catching, yet smooth and small enough so it doesn't dominate your layout. This tutorial will teach you how to create a graphic that does just that.

Step 1

Let's start our new document by setting the background color to #303030. Then create a circular shape using the Ellipse tool (U), keep holding Shift while dragging outwards to create a perfect circle. Start dragging from the center of the canvas while holding down Alt. This way the shape is centered around the initial position of your mouse. Fill this shape with #bcbcbc, and name the layer "ring 1."

Step 2

Duplicate the "ring 1" layer. Then use the Free Transform Tool (CMD+T) to re-size the circle slightly, so that it matches the one created previously. I've named this layer "ring 2."

CTRL + Click on the "ring 2" layer to create a selection around the smaller circle. Then navigate to select > modify > expand. Then use an expansion radius of 3 pixels. Go back to the "ring 1" layer and hit the Add Layer Mask button in the layer palette, as illustrated below. This cuts out the part that is covered by the "ring 2" shape.

Step 3

Next apply layers styles to both "ring 1" and "ring 2" layers. Follow the instructions in the image below. A gradient overlay is generally used on the 'outer shell' of a web graphic to give it depth. It can be used to inset an image when contrasting gradients are used. This is an old technique, which is not necessary for our image. Furthermore, inner glow, when used with dark colors will create a sort of 'inflated' look. It gives the illusion of a shadow being present all around the shape, thus causing the shape to rise up from the canvas.

Step 4

Select "ring 2" again, and on a new layer drag down a gradient. Set this layer to hard light.

Step 5

On a new layer, create another ring and apply the same layer style as was used on "ring 2" (see step 3). I called this layer "ring 3." It may seem unorthodox to stack the same elements over and over again, but the layered effect is a time saving technique used to create something complex looking.

Step 6

Duplicate the "ring 3" layer and call it "fill." Our icon is going to be blue, so fill it with #446fce. Then change the layer styles, as shown in the image below.

Step 7

Duplicate the "fill" layer. Then set the fill to 0% (Not the opacity). Then call it "highlight ring," and apply the layer styles shown below.

Step 8

Create a new layer, call it "highlight brush." Then set it to soft light. Next, using a soft white brush gently tap the top of the blue part until it starts to light up.

Step 9

Go to the custom shape tool. Then at the top, select the arrow that I marked in the image below. Drag this arrow out while holding shift for a nice even shape. Rotate it, so that it faces downwards, use free transform (ctrl/cmd + t) to do this. Then duplicate the layer, move it up a bit (you can use the arrow keys), and again use free transform to make it slightly smaller. Hold shift when making the element smaller so that it retains the correct proportions.

Step 10

I merged these two shapes and called the layer "arrows." Next, add the following layer styles to this layer.

Step 11

Time to add the gloss, I called this layer "glossy". First, I drew out a shape. Then I set the opacity of that layer to 30%. Next, I ctrl/cmd + click on the blue layer. Then I select the circle outline. Hit the mask button (like in step 2), and everything outside of the selection is masked away. Use a soft black brush on the mask, and go right along the edges to soften them up. This is a matter of taste though.

Step 12

Lastly, let's add a shadow on a new layer below all of the other layers we just created. Use a soft black brush and tap in such a way that just the edges of each brush stroke are visible. Our final image is below.

Conclusion

What have we learned in this tutorial? We've learned to stack elements upon themselves to create depth. We've learned to use layer styles to create depth and 3d shapes. We've learned that simple objects can be turned into complex images easily. We've learned that simple glossy effects should be used properly. Don't abuse them. Web 2.0 is much more than just gradients. Enjoy, and thanks for reading!

If you enjoyed this post, your vote is always highly appreciated!! Delicious StumbleUpon Float Reddit Bump This!

Comments

Leave a Comment
  1. first ?

  2. Gravatar

    Zach LeBar

    second?

    :P srry i couldn’t help it

  3. Excelent as usual

  4. Cool icon! Looks very nice!

  5. Seventh!

  6. <3

  7. this is tut is very simple and great for a beginner. although it is very simple, it still produces a great product! great work, arik.

  8. mausyo and Zach Lebar, please stop the infantile behavior and start placing real comments in the post!!..how old are you guys anyway? (if you are under 5 year old disregard my comments)…..anyways….great way to construct an icon, thanks for the tut!! :o)

  9. Gravatar

    Scott Lowe

    8th?

  10. Nice simple tutorial.

  11. Gravatar

    Kim Dolleris

    Looks great! :D thx for sharing!

  12. Cool tutorial, though the edges are a little rough on the icon. Sizing it down for proper use should take care of that.

  13. 1999 anyone? Could you have used anymore gradients for that faux, not even close to realistic, plastic-y look? Looks horrible.

  14. Nice and straight forward, thanks :D

  15. back to glossy again? Hmm….

  16. Nice tut, thanks!

  17. Step 2 has one slight oversight.

    Where it says:

    Go back to the “ring 1″ layer and hit the Add Layer Mask button in the layer palette, as illustrated below. This cuts out the part that is covered by the “ring 2″ shape.

    It should read:

    Go back to the “ring 1″ layer and hit the Add Layer Mask button in the layer palette (then press the keyboard combo of “CTRL + i” to invert the selection), as illustrated below. This cuts out the part that is covered by the “ring 2″ shape.

    For a beginner like me this was a little confusing. If you do not press CTRL + i all you will be doing is making “ring 1″ 3 pixels larger than “ring 2″

    Btw, I love this site!!!!! This site is a dream come true! It is so great to learn how the masters do it!

  18. Correction to my comment above. I also had a slight oversight. Instead of “CTRL + i” it should be “CTRL + SHIFT + i” or you can go to Select > Inverse.

    Cheers!

  19. a fundamental tut -imho

    btw when you are going to publish my EXPLOSION tut bro!!!

  20. Awesome download button!! Definitely bookmarked!

  21. wow. more glossy buttons. Umm, Thanks.

  22. Gravatar

    Brent Nelson

    cool

  23. 19th???

  24. wow thats beautiful.

  25. a feast of layer style goodness - thanks for posting!

  26. looks awesome!

  27. Like candy.

  28. I’m confused by step 5?

    How were you able to duplicate the outer ring? I think that step was left out. I am a beginner so I can’t figure out how to duplicate it. Any help is greatly appreciated. Thanks!

  29. I like the way it turned out and the process. Really clean work.

  30. Never mind i figured out how to do it. I guess I have a lot to learn!

  31. An interesting procedure. Helpful!

  32. i’m stumped by your logic at step 2.

    “Duplicate the “ring 1″ layer. Then use the Free Transform Tool (CMD+T) to re-size the circle slightly, so that it matches the one created previously. I’ve named this layer “ring 2.”"

    why on earth would i duplicate the layer and resize it slightly so it matches the first one? this makes absolutely no sense whatsoever. if it’s resized (larger or smaller…you didn’t specify) it won’t be the same size. if it’s suppose to match the layer it was duplicated from you shouldn’t have to resize it at all because it would be an exact duplicate. am i supposed to resize it larger and then just undo so it goes back to match what it was or what?

    remember, when writing tutorials you need to be incredibly specific because we’re all stupid and can’t read your mind.

  33. Well from the looks of it jason some of us are a bit slower. If you read on just a bit more you see that you are duplicating two rings then you are expand one of them to make the bolder ring. Instead of criticizing his writing skills maybe you should look at your reading ones first.

  34. Nice tutorial.

    But glossy design is on it’s way out.

  35. Nice tut, thanks!

  36. Gravatar

    Colin Williams

    “But glossy design is on it’s way out.”

    I wish inept designers making such remarks were on their way out. $10 to the first person who can explain to “Hyder” (as in ‘hiding behind a lame alias’?) in what context this technique is applicable.

  37. 556-783+400-32-111th?

  38. Testing Gravatar.. the tutorial itself I’m not too fond off, not that its horrible, but the rings around is very old skool design, reminds me of the days html was around, I don’t think people should have an html look anymore.

  39. Nice result! :D

  40. this is poorly drawn. the details are off/weird.

  41. @ Ali . . . wtf???

  42. The end result looks very bad and outdated in my humble opinion, but the techniques are helpful. I guess using different colors would make it much more attractive.

    Oh and to First, second, third, whatever retards: Why the need to show the world that you’re f****** worthless?

  43. Great as usual. :)

  44. I really don’t get why you pay this guy $150 for this hard to understand tutorial. It is VERY confusing.
    The first two steps, you don’t even explain if the circular eclipse tool should be on a SHAPE layer, PATH layer, or a FILL Pixels. Then you go on and don’t even say if we should create a new layer or not on that.
    What the hell are you trying to say? DO NOT PAY THIS GUY… wow is this very confusing. As you can see the other frustration from other comments here. If you want to write a tutorial, MAKE SURE IT IS SPECIFIC……and you are getting paid for this.

  45. not really good, the colours are off and the button style is hardly used these days.

  46. @ Mark.. ?

    My mistake if you didn’t understand what I wrote, you see I wrote that right after I woke up, anyway long story short I meant that tutorial icon looked outdated considering how modern web design is based on strict xhtml/css & web 2.0.. It looks like something I would’ve seen many years ago when html was common practice. It just looks like something that shouldn’t be used anymore, and I think the rings around it actually makes it look worse, I’d say it’ll look better without the additional rings around it.

    Just my thoughts.

  47. Last so far !!!

  48. Great! Thanks!

    David Carreira

  49. Not bad. Techniques that I already know but good for a refresher. Thanks.

  50. a good tut for something that’s sooooo 1998 thou?! are people REALLY still making buttons like that ?

  51. @ Bogus

    Look at the screenshot for a second, see a solid filled shape? Now use your brain for a second, will a path layer create a solid filled shape…if I would want you to create a path layer, I’d tell you to that and THEN to fill the shape with the color by specifically saying that you should right click and use the fill option.

    Although I encourage you to write your own tutorial and show me how it’s done, that would be very helpful.

    As far as this being outdated, look the current standard of web 2.0 graphics generally means that you create a rounded rectangle, fill it with a gradient, add a shadow and put up some text. That’s the basic look. I agree that this look is 2003-ish but AGAIN. Don’t see this as something that you can smack somewhere and go all ‘oh wow that looks good’. If you are going to create an interface using elements such as these they will have to match.

    Furthermore, especially for the ‘new guy’ I think it’s important that people see how looks were created back in 02-03. It used to be a totally different approach to design and a totally different outcome, even though we’ve stopped using the trend (and moved on to something that looks horrible on most sites imo) we had back then, it still doesn’t mean that designers shouldn’t know anything about it, in fact if it weren’t for those cheesy glossy buttons back in the day I probably wouldn’t had learned how to properly use a lot of tools even though I don’t create those effects anymore they were very useful in my learning process.

  52. And thanks to Ed and Jason for pointing out the mistakes.

  53. Gravatar

    styxzdesigns

    very nice indeed =D

  54. Sorry, but this looks awfull….

  55. I think the final product of this tutorial looks pretty damn good. That is why I tried to create it in Photoshop right away but couldn’t understand the instructions that well. I will try again though. But this button is DAMN SEXY.

  56. Gravatar

    andrioglu

    sorry, step 2 is too confusing, explain better please. (i’m not a pro, but still)
    like the result though

  57. Gravatar

    Johan Munk

    Nice tut, although I’m not too fond of the look of the button, I think it’s a nice tut, showing us beginners how to use a bunch of tools.

    Thanks

  58. Boo Hoo…let me complain about the FREE tutorial.
    I think a lot of people are missing the point of a tutorial, which is to teach you techniques and strategies. You dont necessarily need to put glossy buttons all over your site. And if its not a technique you care to learn, why not just skip the tutorial?

  59. Gravatar

    Nouman Saleem

    Though it seems like people don’t appreciate the tutorial due to the outcome, however it does include some very useful techniques and its great practice!

    Nice one :)

  60. I am new to sites like this one and I am also new to photoshop so I am puzzled as to why there are so many rude people leaving such nasty comments. I for one really appreciate everyone involved in bringing these tutorials to newbies like me. If these rude people find these tutorials so basic then why the heck are they here? If they are so great at everything they do, then why don’t they have a website just as outstanding as this one?

    I have never before paid for a design tutorial website and I can sincerely say that I would have paid more to have access to such talented designers and to read up on how such works of art are made.

  61. I must admit , step 2 was pretty hard to understand. I’m pretty stumped, I think I’m gonna show this to my teacher. Perhaps he can give me a few answers about how to approach this.

  62. web 2.0 is about code…

  63. Man am I glad, that we’re actually discussing design in the comments now! I was getting so tired of the “great thanks” comments. As far as this being outdated, sure I can see that a bit. But so what? This is a tutorials website, it teaches you techniques that you can apply elsewhere, while still creating something that looks awesome. If you really wanted to go all Web 2.0, what are you doing on PSDtuts? Go to CSS/XHTML tuts, better yet NETtuts. Buttons are easy to make in CSS, this is better for icons and things of that nature. If you can show me a way to create a circle in CSS using strictly code and a bit of text fine, otherwise shutup. Images in HTML is pre-2.0. To summarize, this is a free tutorial site, teaching you Photoshop techniques that you can use in your own, “2.0″ designs.

    Also, someone tell David Carreira his site is linked in his gravatar. :D Just messing with ya David.

  64. I love this site, but I gotta say that this is about the worst tutorial I’ve seen here. Not only is it overly confusing, it’s not even necessary because you can achieve the same effects with 2 built-in layer styles and skip most of the tut in the process. That’s on top of the fact that as far as the Glassy Orb style goes, this isn’t the easiest, nor the best looking tut I’ve seen out there.

    You can get better, more realistic results using gradients in Illustrator.

  65. Confusing tutorial, but a fine insight in some good techniques.

    Is there any mentionable reasons as to why the tutorials in here are not video tutorials? If i could see what the author was doing i didnt have to sit and guess my way through half a tutorial.

    Also, a video tutorial allows the viewer to see how the artist has his or her way with certain concepts, soft brush techniques for shadows and highlights for example.

  66. Cool icon.. Thanks for the tut.

  67. Nice tut.
    But I am really confused with the step 2. I cannot understand this step. Could you please explain?

  68. i’m sorry, but this is garbage, when i have the ring layer 2 there, i cannot do the “select, modify, expand” because modify isn’t lit up as a usable option, so even though it does look cool, it’s garbage

  69. @Soup

    ctrl (or cmd) click the part of the layer, in the layers palette, that holds the circle shape to activate the selection. Then you can modify it.

  70. Gravatar

    godonholiday

    the colours dont add up?

    the blue up to step 11 is different from that in step 12?

  71. nevermind, you didn’t answer me back, so my conclusion is, THIS TUTORIAL SUCKS. Hard to follow and understand.. nothing works. Most steps are confusing. 0/10

  72. I really appreciate the fabulous tutorials that are presented here. I’m really improving my Photoshop skills and making my life as a web developer easier.

    Regardless of the final design produced here, this tutorial taught some helpful and useful techniques, but overall was confusing and difficult to follow. There is a lot of information missing that makes it hard for people not already proficient in PhotoShop to follow without lots of trial and error and resorting to the Help menu. Also, some explanation on all those layer styles, why they’re being chosen, and what they’re accomplishing would be helpful too.

    I look forward to more great tutorials.

  73. Gravatar

    Creekjumper

    I found I had to inverse my selection, before I added the layer mask, in order to produce the correct results.

  74. Gravatar

    Paul Parson

    You do have to inverse the selection to achieve the demonstrated result. However, the screen grab provided is correct. So, an observant reader might have caught that detail, especially since you would have just gotten the opposite effect.

    Regarding the glossy icon effect itself, I don’t believe any of these tutorials to be ‘plug and play’…you’re missing the point of a tutorial. They are not to copy and slap on your site, but rather to teach techniques that can be applied to a variety of creative and original designs.

    That said, I hope that we (readers/contributors) don’t see regurgitated ‘tuts’ like you see on many other sites, where content/originality/explanation/grammar go out the window. Thus far, I have seen a lot of great stuff on this site. And hope it continues.

    But is it not the community that helps keep accountable those that contribute? Of course. So don’t waste an opportunity to comment with “this tutorial is crap!”…but critique it…constructively.

  75. Gravatar

    Nilson saavedra

    nice looking botton, great effect, i like, maybe use it for flash bottons

  76. I have CS3. That might be the reason for me this is dificult cause I am just a beginner… :(

  77. i found that this is a really confusing tutorial… i really like the theory and end product though…

    maybe a few more steps (even if they are obvious to some more advanced users) would be a good idea in future?

  78. Thanks for the Tutorial.
    I enjoyed it very much

  79. come on! i’ve seen a gazillion of these icon tutorials, do something that challenges yourself.

  80. Thanks for putting everything on one page.

  81. very cool!

  82. reminds me of kindergarten :P “if you got nothing good to say, say nothing at all”

  83. Gravatar

    redplague111

    @jeoffrey mahusay < mediocre

  84. Personally, I am really fond of Glossy Buttons. :D That’s why I am making one….dozen….

  85. Seriously….

    Some of you “professional” designers are ridiculous.

    Quit being so self righteous and do not post comments.

    I appreciate the people taking the time to make these tutorials.

    This particular one was simple, and effective.

    Great Job, and Thanks!

  86. Great looking icon, I’ll have to do the tutorial and see the outcome.

    Unfortunately for me, I have a bad habit of reading comments before I do a tutorial to look for any missing areas or sections throughout the tutorial that people had already found to have mistakes. Once again they have, and will no doubt make the tutorial easier to follow. It’s a common mistake and you should not let these morons get to you.

    As for the rest of you “perfect” designers.

    The first person to make the remark that the icon made here was outdated, just got through reading that from some other post, on some other site.

    The rest that followed, did exactly that. You followed. All you will ever be is mindless sheep that follow what another person says because it will make you on top of your game right?

    Who are you to say this icon is outdated? Do you make the rules, do you set the trends? This man is helping thousands of people by posting a tutorial, and the only thing you do is come here and criticize him. Well guess what? You are here too, you found the tutorial and clicked on it just like the rest of us. Get off your high horse and quit trying to be the professional, all knowing, web guru.

    In closing, the only thing that has become outdated is people like you who try to push your opinions that you got from the last site you read.

    Again, thanks for the tutorial and keep up the good work.

Add a Comment

Note: We use Gravatars on PSDTUTS, they are little icons that appear next to your name on this site and on many others. You can get a Gravatar account for free and any other site that supports it will show your avatar too!

 

Trackbacks

Leave a Trackback